My Photo

Square J Designs

Recent Posts

« December 2006 | Main | April 2007 »

March 28, 2007

Has Tacori Jumped The Proverbial Shark Tank By Getting In Bed With QVC Or Is It Just Good Business?

J21399001 I am a loyal reader of the newish JCK Online blog called Behind The Counter, and in particular a big fan of writer Shanu Singh Guliani's ability to bring forth simple, yet thoughtful topics.  The blog is intended for consumption by those in the trade, but the subjects are disclosed in a manner such that anyone with a passing interest can understand and digest the information readily and also participate.

A couple of weeks ago she introduced a topic that I really believe has legs, and I wanted to wait to see how the comments would flesh out.  As expected, respondents are nearly evenly divided.  In her article Tacori: Are They Turning Their Backs On Independents? Shanu discusses how a little over a month ago, Tacori, an historically esteemed Los Angeles-based jeweler known for their intricate design work with platinum and diamonds, and perhaps equally known for their celebrity relationships and ability to cater to those with very deep pockets jumped into the sack with QVC.  Some thought it shocking and peculiar, but the more questions I ask, the more sighing and eye-rolling I encounter.  Take from that what you will.

This alliance brought Tacori's design elements together with QVC's "Platinum Clad" (sterling silver) and "Diamonique" (simulated gemstones) ostensibly to make Tacori affordable to the masses.  The result was a phenomenal success for both QVC and Tacori, having sold out of all of their merchandise in only 18 minutes.

I mean, Christ on a crouton, that's on par with ticket sell-out rates for the Rolling Stones.

Shanu asks some valid questions of store owners and salespeople,

It’s about a month later—how do you feel?  Do you dread the customer that comes in and says, “I bought my Tacori Ring off of QVC,” while standing next to another customer who has a $3000 Tacori ring on her hand debating if the brand is suddenly the right engagement ring to have, to bind her and her future husband’s eternal love.

Do you keep the line?  Send it back?  Never reorder again?  Or are you celebrating with Tacori?  Are you happy that now more of your clients know about the brand…  the name Tacori?  Or do you stash it in the back of the showroom hoping to pull customers to the side to take a look at this high-end brand that now sells on QVC?  On the other hand, who cares…  I’m a great salesperson, I have a great store, I love my customers and that’s the bottom line.

As I mentioned, the responses were nearly evenly divided.  Some jewelers are thrilled; some are disgusted.  One is saddened they'll have to part ways and terminate their relationship with Tacori.  One respondent was a civilian (non-jewelry industry type) whose wife's $9000 Tacori wedding ring set had been stolen and his insurance was only giving them a $1000 replacement and he was thrilled to have this option in the interim.  (That was actually very sad to read.  Bet he buys better insurance next time.  He said Tacori/QVC were super nice, accommodating and professional in getting him on the waitlist (!) for a QVC set (!) for his wife.)

Here's the thing.  Brands do this all the time.  Look at, say, Isaac Mizrahi.  He has three (four?) lines.  You can buy an Isaac Mizrahi shirt for $295 from Saks Fifth Avenue, one from Nordstorm Rack for $49 and one from Target for $19.99.  And shoes!  All at different price points.  Burberry carries different lines, too.  Ralph Lipschitz Lauren - my God, he has about eight or nine women's clothing lines.  There's a difference between, say, the RL polo shirt and the Polo polo shirt.  This is nothing new.

Does this dilute the brand?  Maybe, maybe not.  We could discuss this ad infinitum and never reach an agreement.  The only way designers make money is by diversifying and selling other stuff besides clothing, anyhow.  They must brand, as in a verb, themselves.  Perfume, baby!

J21408001 My question for you is this:  would you have a problem if you had a $10,000 Tacori ring set and you were channel-surfing one night and saw "Tacori for Epiphany" being advertised on QVC and curiosity got the best of you and you discovered your exact treasured set (minus the precious materials) being sold for under $200, including shipping and tax?  And from all reports, the QVC stuff simply isn't garbage, much as we'd like for it to be.  It just isn't.  It's well-made enough stuff for what it is.  As long as you know what it is.

But let's be honest, girl to girl.  You can't tell me this wouldn't get your goat just a little bit.  Get stuck in your craw?  But you would shake it off like a big girl, right?  Right?  Just don't let your husband see that QVC show.  Ever! 

You, however, may go shop at QVC.com and search for Tacori in jewelry and find a suitable travel bauble or two or perhaps a set for your next foray into Darkest Peru or wherever your peripatetic muse takes you.  Hell, just get something because you like the look of it...  $70 won't break the bank and if you don't like it when you see it on your mitt or your neck or your lobes, they have a liberal return policy.

Plus, you're fantastic.  No one will know it's paste.  Quite honestly, mixing these simulated pieces with your own genuine ones isn't a grand faux pas.  In fact it's done more often than you'd think.  Buying some for travel pieces is a superb idea.  If you are a woman who carries herself with elegance and good carriage, who is going to question the authenticity your jewelry selections?  Certainly no one else of proper elegance and carriage.

A few caveats to keeping your secret...  if you happen to run into me or my mother we might corner you and ask you about your jewelry.  We've been known to do that.  Not to verify authenticity or question your selection, of course not, but to admire and examine them more closely.  We'll keep your secret.  As well, avoid flashing these in fine jewelry stores and trying to pass them off as the real deal.  Stay out of those places.  And finally, don't take them off and hand them to anyone.  That's a dead giveaway.  That silver weighs far less than platinum.

J21408001_2 J21414001 J21408001_3 My personal recommendation?  WWBBB?  What Would Bling Blog Buy?  I'd buy these three and stack them in this order.  The blue one comes in red, too.  Big look, small price.  And I'd keep them very clean.

(photos from QVC)

March 24, 2007

Is There Even A Category For This In The World Record Books? There Is Now, Apparently.

Liljonguinessrecords335a032307In case you woke up this morning with any question in your mind or heart whether or not crunk was still alive, have no fear, Lil' Jon thinks it is.  He is so utterly convinced that Crunk Ain't Dead, he has had this inspiring dictum emblazoned upon the World's Largest Freaking Diamond Pendant.  Oh, hell yeah, boyeeeeeee, the Dirty South shall rise again with Lil' Jon leading the charge.

This masterpiece was created by Jason of Beverly Hills.  Insiders at Rap Basement note that the $500,000 pendant is 7.5 inches tall, six inches wide, one inch thick, and weighs over five pounds.  It has 3,756 white diamonds totalling 73 carats, all set in 18-karat white and yellow gold.  Can you say "herniated C4 disc" if that bizzatch was made in platinum?

To the window...  to the wall...
  Please don't ask me how I know about that song.  Or how it ended up in my car's CD changer.

(photo from JCK Online)

March 19, 2007

Statement Rings: Are You Going To Make A Statement Or Just Hush Up?

The latest Neiman Marcus "book" hath arrived in all of its metallic silver and turquoise splendor to my mailbox.  Amidst the above-the-knee hemlines and long dresses and short tube dresses and trapeze dresses (so confused, so confused, head huuuuurts) there are the so-called "Statement Rings."

The "Statement Rings" are big knuckle-busters that, well, make a big, um, statement.  They're sort of this year's version of last year's cocktail ring.  Which was last year's version of the previous year's brightly-colored bubble gum machine ring.  Which was that year's version of...  you get the idea.

Some are beautiful, some are so-so, and some are downright awful.  Some of them play that mark-up game wherein they are priced at such a ridiculously inflated price point because you would not otherwise purchase them.  You know the ones?  If you saw them priced for what they're worth you'd think something was terribly wrong?  Right.  So take a look at the good, the bad, and the very, very awful.  And some nice surprises, too.

Nmy015k_mh At left is a Stephen Dweck cushion-cut green agate ring set in polished bronze.  It's offered in sizes 6 or 7.

I picked it because it's green and I like green.

It's available for $330.

WTF?!

Agate and bronze for $330?!  Why is it $330?  Well, because you wouldn't pay $30 for it, would you, now?  And not at Neiman Marcus.  That's why.

Nmy024e_mhMoving right along.  While it's no secret that I am not a huge fan of David Yurman, he has this "statement" thing down to a science and this one is damn near the pick of the litter.  In fact, you could take almost any of the Yurman puppies home and not kick your own ass, which is more than I can say for something I am going to show you later on.

This piece is sterling silver and 18K white gold with a big amethyst and .41 carats of pavé diamonds for $1325.  P.S.  Most of the $1325 is in those diamonds and the gold.  Amethysts, while large and colorful are cheap.  Particularly ones that are light purple like this one.  Still, it's quite a pretty ring and way more bang for the comparative buck than the Dweck.

Nm0tl8_mn More nicely-executed Yurman.  Color me shocked.  But in this dubious company of rings Yurman is the standout winner.

These are cable-shanked oval rings in either citrine or smoky quartz with rhodolite garnet, garnet and diamond accents set in sterling silver and 18 karat yellow gold.

The citrine is $1650 and the smoky quartz is $1450.

Again, the money is in the gold and diamonds for the most part.  You can spend money on citrine, but it's gotta be Madeira or similar.  That one is simply large.

Nmj4548_mn And now, for something completely different.

This is called the Palu Saddle ring from John Hardy for $750.

It is made in Bali, and fashioned of woven sterling silver and hammered 22-karat gold.

To me, this one is unusual and different, yet recognizable at the same time.  Hardy lovers will feel comfortable with the woven silver and the silver and gold combination.  Newcomers to Hardy will like the hammered high-karat gold.  It's not what is expected and it's chunky, but also graceful.

Nmy00lm_mh Ah, yes.  Hello, Shitty Kitty.

The only "statements" that this $4,250 "imported" (read: CHINA) ring makes are:

1.  I like kitschy, krappy kitties.

2.  Someone best hide the credit cards from me.

3.  I want to buy Kimora Lee Simmons a new gold toilet.  Because everyone needs a gold-plated throne.  Eek.

(all photos from Neiman Marcus)

March 18, 2007

A Platinum And Diamond Palliative From Daniel K

Daniel_k_clover_pendantIf you were a dipsomaniacal dimwit on St. Patrick's Day, or had to suffer the fools ungladly, I hope this clover pendant from Daniel K serves to calm your jittery soul.  It does mine.

It's my way of apologizing for that photo of what'shisgreasybutt earlier.  Sorry.

What do you think?  I kind of love it.  Daniel K makes wonderful use of today's ubiquitous, yet elegant, Asscher-cut diamond in their pieces.  Go check out the site.  I have some favorites.  Let's discuss.

(photo from Daniel K via the Platinum Guild International)

This Might Give You A Hang O'Ver If You Don't Already Have One From Yesterday's Shenanigans

EwwgrossEw, ick.

That's Colin Farrell wearing a platinum and diamond pavé clover pendant made by the design firm of QuiénSabe or WhoKnowsWho?  It's moderately pretty, but the photo is terribly low-res.  It was sent to me by a PR firm in LA, however they failed to attribute either the photo or the jewelry.  This happens a lot.

He looks like he has the greasy sweats in every single photo he takes, doesn't he?  If that picture doesn't put you off your lunch, what will?  Would someone please remind me why this person is a movie star?

March 17, 2007

Happy St. Patty O'Furniture Day!

B_gg9037aa1 A curious convergence of evil combined with the luck o' the Irish (it's always the luck o' the Irish, no?) had St. Patrick's Day fall on a Saturday, thus rendering the roadways unsafe for driving after about 9:30 AM unless you happen to have an M1 Abrams in your garage.

So Wendy B. has kindly provided us with a fantastic eye-clean 12.47 oval step-cut light green tsavorite upon which to turn our collective attention.

March 16, 2007

Lizard Hurley Shows Some Restraint

Okay, not really.

But according to today's JCKStyle, Elizabeth Hurley was adorned in elaborate and beautiful henna tattoos as part of her traditional Hindu wedding garb and ceremony last week in India.  The rest of her get-up, however, was a bit more pricey and included,

"a diamond-encrusted sari worth $7,700, earrings worth $53,000, and a bracelet valued at $26,000.  Nayar's jeweled coat and turban set the couple back $6,600.  At least sensible Hurley didn't waste funds on fleeting pleasures:  her henna hand tattoos cost just $5."

As we've previously discussed, I doubt they paid for any of the jewelry as it was likely gifted or loaned to them by Chopard or another entity.  No news, however, what these jewels were or what jeweler created them.  It strikes me as odd that Nayar would not take advantage of some of the wonderfully exotic and beautiful jewels crafted in his native country.

I'll wait and see until I can gander at some photos before passing judgment on this one.  After all, she was wearing a sari and saris can be gorgeous.  I'm dying to see what this one looked like.  Would it kill her to wear some rubies and 22K for one day?  I mean, you're in India after all.

March 14, 2007

Kathy Hilton Wears And Returns $1 Million Jacket, Still Has Paris & Nicky

Hpdkah Kathy Avanzino Hilton, house painter's daughter, mother of trainwrecks Paris and Nicky and unflappable bicoastal Cleopatra was shimmering in a $1 million platinum and diamond jacket as she was honored for her good works at "The Women's Project" soiree in New York on March 12th.

Mrs. Hilton's jacket had two pounds of platinum and 300 carats of diamonds adorning it.  The diamonds were from the venerable Lazare Kaplan diamond cutters, the creators of The Original Ideal Cut Diamond™.

Sadly, the jacket was a loaner.  Now, if only there were such a liberal return policy on people...  Noooo, she loooooves her darlings, yes she does!

(photo courtesy of the Platinum Guild International)

March 13, 2007

Elizabeth Hurley Finally Gets A Ring

So, uh, that lucky dog Arun Nayar got married to Elizabeth Hurley last week in England and again this week in India.

And what lovely events they turned out to be; so lovely in fact that even Hugh Grant who had nothing better to do since splitting up with Jemima Khan didn't show up.  The fact that Hughie didn't show up was almost as newsworthy as the wedding itself.  Heh.  (Go Hugh!)

Now, what was I talking about...  Oh!

Elizabitchhurley Here's the ring, finally.  Remember when we last spoke about her she didn't have an engagment ring yet, was allergic to her intended's entire country and wasn't washing her hands?

Well, she's got one now and it's real purty.

It's a 15.09-carat Asscher-cut diamond set in white gold with a pavé band.  According to British Vogue the ring,

"...was bought by the couple from the "Haute Joallerie" collection at Chopard's Bond Street store. Elizabeth's close friend Caroline Gruosi-Scheufele, who is also the creative director and co-president of Chopard, designed the engagement ring especially for the occasion. The jewellers also created the bride's wedding band - 20 square-cut 3.91 carat diamonds also set in white gold."

Okay.  Two things.

1. Bought by the couple from Chopard?  No.  I think not.  Liz Hurley is a hired shill for Chopard.  She is forever seen wearing Chopard everything.  Earrings, watches, necklaces, rings.  TiarasEspecially tiaras if she can get her mitts on them.

2. Twenty square-cut 3.91-carat diamonds set in white gold for a wedding band?  Must be a typo.  Her finger would have to be the girth of my wrist to handle twenty nearly 4-carat diamonds in band form.  I think that's 3.91 carats total carat weight.

I hope you're all as thrilled as I am that this affair gave her the opportunity to dress up like a "pretty, pretty princess" (thank you, Bingley) and have many, many wardrobe changes over the course of eight or ten days.

As well it allowed her to drag her already spooky-looking-and-not-ironically-named-Damian kid, expose him to more flashbulbs all, I suppose, in the name of family.

Ugh, poor kid... with a mother like that and an absent sperm-donor priapistic billionaire for a father?

And now a new stepfather who says their life on the farm in Gloucestershire is rather idyllic:

"I'll take Damian out on the tractor while Elizabeth cooks.  It's a bit like the Waltons."

Right...  Just like that.  Can you hear it now?  I can.

Damian:  G'night Mummy.

Elizabeast:  Damian, have you seen Mummy's ring?

Damian:  Oh, no, Mummy.  What ring?

Elizabitch:  Mummy's shiny, shiny ring from her wedding.

Damian:  The ring you wore at the wedding that lasted for six thousand ten million months and years?

Elizzardbreath:  Yes, Damian, sweet Little Lord Fauntleroy, that one, where Mummy wore the tiara on nights 1, 2, 4, 5 and 7.

Damian:  The big knuckle-buster ring you wore at the wedding where they sacrificed the goat and Shilpa Shetty danced until she puked and some weird ladies painted me with mustard paste and Uncle Hugh didn't come because he has some sense?

Eslatternly:  Yeeeeees, that one.  Have you seen my pretty, pretty ring?

Damian:  Uhhh...  nope.  And neither has Paddington.

(photo from British Vogue)